For decades, demurrage in bulk shipping has been accepted as a cost of doing business. A necessary evil. A line item. But that thinking no longer holds up. As charterers face tighter margins, freight volatility, and greater pressure to optimize operations, the industry must take a closer look at what demurrage actually represents. Behind every claim is a trail of decisions, documents, delays, and—most importantly—data.
When viewed holistically, demurrage is not just a penalty. It is a signal. One that reveals inefficiencies, exposes outdated workflows, and highlights missed opportunities. And for companies willing to treat it as such, demurrage becomes more than a cost to control—it becomes a catalyst for transformation.
The Standardization Problem No One Talks About
If bulk shipping had consistent, digital documentation standards, demurrage management would look very different. But it doesn’t. Unlike containers, where the push for electronic bills of lading is gaining traction, the bulk sector remains fragmented.
Statements of Facts still arrive in multiple formats—scanned PDFs, Word docs, even photos. Letters of protest vary wildly by agent. Time sheets aren’t always signed or timestamped. This lack of standardization makes it nearly impossible to automate workflows or analyze data at scale.
Yes, organizations like BIMCO and INTERCARGO have published SoF templates. But adoption remains low. Most ports lack the infrastructure or alignment to enforce them. As a result, each claim starts from scratch.
Until true industry-wide standardization takes hold, charterers must take matters into their own hands. This means using systems to organize and standardize voyage data within their own companies, creating a reliable and consistent source of information, even if the data isn’t perfect. By doing this, charterers can strengthen their operations and be less affected by changes in the market.
Where Time (and Money) Gets Lost
Resolving a demurrage claim means retracing every step of the voyage—logs, notices, timestamps, delays. But where exactly is the time being spent?
Inspired by a Mckinsey’s study regarding Bills of Lading, the diagram below maps a typical bulk vessel port call from arrival to post-departure documentation. Each circle represents the relative time investment in document analysis and processing at each stage—a reflection of how manual paperwork in shipping and demurrage consumes valuable analyst hours across the voyage lifecycle.
This breakdown allows us to ask new questions:
- How much time is spent preparing and validating documents before berth?
- What additional effort is required while the vessel is at berth, logging delays and operational events?
- And what volume of hours is consumed after the vessel has sailed, especially once a claim is initiated?
That brings us to an average of 21 to 35 hours per voyage, spent mostly by highly trained personnel.
The Labor Cost: High-Value Talent, Low-Value Tasks
Operators and analysts spend hours cross-referencing logs, retyping timestamps, and matching events across unsigned or inconsistent SoFs. These are professionals capable of scenario modeling, commercial strategy, and dynamic decision-making. Yet they’re pulled into document cross-checking, copying and pasting information, and low-value tasks.
Now assume a demurrage analyst earns $50,000/year and processes 10 claims per month. That’s between 2,520 and 4,200 hours per year dedicated to manual claim processing — representing $63,000 to $105,000 in indirect labor costs involved in a voyage.
Scale that across a team, and the cost of friction becomes impossible to ignore.
History on Repeat: Why Pattern Recognition Matters
Many demurrage claims stem from predictable problems. A port that routinely takes longer to discharge. A vessel that consistently submits late or inconsistent documents. A counterparty that disputes the same clause voyage after voyage.
Structured data changes that. When SoFs and claim records are aggregated, patterns emerge. High-friction ports, recurring delays, and clause misalignments can be visualized, benchmarked, and addressed proactively. Some charterers have started building internal dashboards that track disputes by clause type or counterparty—turning demurrage history into strategic foresight.
So where does this leave charterers? Waiting for industry-wide standardization is not a strategy. And continuing with manual, fragmented demurrage management is not sustainable.
Instead, charterers can take control. By structuring their own SoF and claim data, building internal benchmarks, and integrating insights into contract planning, they unlock a new level of operational foresight. Tools that organize documents, track claims, and surface anomalies aren’t just back-office upgrades—they’re strategic assets.
Yes, demurrage will always exist. Weather happens. Ports congest. But that doesn’t mean the outcomes must be unpredictable. As long as manual paperwork in shipping and demurrage remains the norm, inefficiencies will persist. With the right systems, charterers can reduce avoidable delays, negotiate smarter clauses, and ensure their operations reflect the realities on the ground.
Demurrage doesn’t have to be the end of the story. It can be the beginning of a more intelligent one.
Before You Go…
CHECK OUT OUR NEW TOOL!
Explore our updated Port Turnaround Insights—a free tool to benchmark time in port by vessel type, cargo, and season. It’s just a snapshot of the data our clients use to improve planning and reduce demurrage exposure.
GET OUR LATEST PLAYBOOK
Download our latest eBook, The Steps Behind Managing a Demurrage Claim, and learn how to review claims more effectively, reduce error rates, and negotiate with confidence.
Follow The Voyager Dispatch on LinkedIn
Our weekly newsletter tracks global dynamics shaping chartering, demurrage, and freight. Want updates delivered straight to your feed? Follow us on LinkedIn to never miss a Dispatch.