The Spread Between ‘Paper’ and ‘Water’ Widens. If you looked only at the futures screens this week, you’d see a market bracing for a glut. Oil has broken the $60 floor, and the outlook for 2026 screams oversupply. But talk to anyone fixing a vessel in the Eastern Mediterranean or trying to clear a cargo through the Suez, and the reality is starkly different. We are witnessing a decoupling of commodity price from logistical cost. While the commodity itself is getting cheaper, the cost of moving it (legally and efficiently) is skyrocketing due to a thickening web of sanctions and regulatory friction. The headline story isn’t the price of oil; it’s the 1.4 billion barrels currently sitting on the water, a “phantom stockpile” created not by demand, but by the sheer difficulty of finalizing trades in a sanctioned world.
Wet Bulk: The Two-Tiered Market
The tanker market has effectively split into two parallel realities: the transparent trade and the shadow trade, with the gap between them creating bizarre localized spikes.
Clean & Dirty Dynamics — While the general Baltic indices for LR2s softened modestly this week (MEG/Japan drifting to ~WS149), specific corridors are seeing unprecedented volatility. S&P Global reported a record $500,000 lump sum premium for LR2s transiting the Suez Canal, driven by a “sanctions rush.” This is the friction tax in action: as the EU prepares to tighten the noose on Russian exports (with a full ban on LNG imports now ratified for late 2027), charterers are paying up for compliant tonnage to clear barrels before the window closes.
Floating Storage & Crude — In the crude segment, the “barrels at sea” phenomenon is distorting the supply picture. The 1.4 billion barrels currently floating are largely sanctioned volumes (Russia, Iran, Venezuela) taking longer, circuitous routes or waiting for ship-to-ship transfer windows. For charterers, this is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it removes tonnage from the spot market, artificially tightening supply. On the other, it hangs over the market like a Sword of Damocles: if those barrels find a home, the resulting discharge could collapse the fragile rate recovery. Meanwhile, West African exports are tipped for a rebound in 2025, offering a glimmer of hope for Suezmax demand in the Atlantic Basin.
The Charterer’s Lens – Wet Bulk:
- Sanctions Clauses: Audit your “sanctions limitation” clauses immediately. The record Suez premiums suggest that delays or rejections due to counterparty risk are becoming expensive operational realities, not just legal theories.
- Fix Forward on Clean: With US refinery cuts tightening gasoil supply in Asia and the Suez premium spiking, the arb window for jet/diesel is erratic. Locking in freight for Q1 2026 deliveries now, before the full weight of new EU rules hits, may be prudent.
- Demurrage Risk: The “floating storage” glut implies port congestion at discharge points willing to take distressed cargoes. Ensure laytime calculations account for extended waiting times in non-OECD discharge zones.
Dry Bulk: The Atlantic-Pacific Divergence
The final full trading week of 2025 (Week 51) ended with the characteristic pre-holiday whimper, but the underlying currents suggest a shift in 2026.
Capesize & Panamax — The Capesize market is finishing the year with a distinct Atlantic bias. While the Pacific C10 route routed to ~$11,200/day, the Atlantic C8 held ground at ~$17,300, supported by a floor in trans-Atlantic mineral demand. However, the Panamax sector is flashing red, with rates in Asia selling off aggressively ($11k levels for 81k dwt).
The bright spot remains South America. Data from Brazil suggests the soy chain is poised for a massive 2025, with GDP from the sector expected to jump nearly 12% on volume recovery. For charterers, this signals that the ECSA (East Coast South America) grain export season in Q1/Q2 2026 will likely be the primary driver of Panamax volatility, potentially squeezing tonnage that is currently idling in a weak Pacific.
Commodity Flows — Coal is the laggard. The retreat of thermal coal in Europe is accelerating, leaving owners dependent on the Asian renewable transition timeline, which is proving slower but inevitable. Conversely, the cement and aluminum trades are waking up to the reality of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which enters its definitive phase in 2026. Importers are already signaling “supply challenges,” which is code for “we need to re-source from closer, greener origins,” potentially hurting ton-mile demand.
The Charterer’s Lens – Dry Bulk:
- Position for ECSA: If you have Panamax/Kamsarmax requirements for March/April 2026, watch the ballast list towards Brazil closely. The current Pacific weakness might discourage ballasters, creating a localized shortage when the soy harvest hits the ports.
- CBAM clauses: For industrial bulk (cement, aluminum), 2026 contracts must allocate the cost of carbon certificates. If your Incoterms are DDP (Delivered Duty Paid), you are walking into a massive unhedged liability. Switch to CIF or FOB where possible.
- Bunker Spreads: With VLSFO demand peaking and bio-bunker uptake in Singapore facing “regulatory uncertainty,” stick to conventional fueling strategies for Q1. The green premium is currently carrying too much operational risk.
Regulatory & Other: The Year of the "Hard Stop"
2026 is shaping up to be the year where theoretical regulations become hard stops. The EU Parliament’s approval of a total ban on Russian gas (LNG spot by 2026, pipeline by 2027) is a massive structural change. It guarantees that Europe’s LNG demand will remain a long-haul game (US/Qatar) for the next decade, putting a permanent floor under LNG carrier demand.
Simultaneously, the “shadow” fleet is facing a crackdown. The record Suez premiums for LR2s are a direct result of legitimate tonnage becoming scarce as “grey” ships are squeezed out of mainstream trade lanes.
The Charterer’s Lens – Regulatory & Risk:
- LNG Duration: The 2027 ban on Russian pipeline gas confirms the long-term bullish case for LNG shipping. Spot exposure in the winter of 2026/27 will be lethal. Term coverage is essential.
- Traceability: With the “shadow fleet” scrutiny intensifying, expect port state control (PSC) in the EU to be aggressive. Ensure your vetting department has cleared the entire ownership chain of your vessel, not just the technical manager.
Last Words: The Efficiency Trap
As we head into 2026, the market is caught in an “Efficiency Trap.” We have the technology and the fleet to move cargo more efficiently than ever, but geopolitics is forcing us to be inefficient. We are sailing further to avoid sanctions (Russia), waiting longer to discharge (floating storage), and paying premiums to cross canals that should be routine.
For the last two years, “optionality” was a buzzword. In 2026, it is the only viable strategy. The charterers who will win are not those who predict the price of oil, but those who can navigate the friction cost of moving it. The spread between a barrel in the ground and a barrel at the refinery gate has never been wider; and that spread is where the freight market lives.
Until next week,
— The Voyager Team
Before You Go…
CHECK OUT OUR NEW TOOL!
Explore our updated Port Turnaround Insights—a free tool to benchmark time in port by vessel type, cargo, and season. It’s just a snapshot of the data our clients use to improve planning and reduce demurrage exposure.
GET OUR LATEST PLAYBOOK
Download our latest eBook, The Steps Behind Managing a Demurrage Claim, and learn how to review claims more effectively, reduce error rates, and negotiate with confidence.
Follow The Voyager Dispatch on LinkedIn
Our weekly newsletter tracks global dynamics shaping chartering, demurrage, and freight. Want updates delivered straight to your feed? Follow us on LinkedIn to never miss a Dispatch.