Opening View: A Market Moving in Contradictions
In the tanker space, trade flows may be shifting—but the real volatility lies beneath. War-risk premiums are surging, sanctions regimes are fragmenting, and yet chartering behavior remains stubbornly inconsistent. Tanker routes once considered high-risk remain active. Spot rates are soft despite logistical disruption. And freight exposure is increasingly shaped not by volume, but by friction: insurance clauses, flag scrutiny, and access to clean tonnage. For charterers, the task now is not simply to read the market—but to rethink what defines it.
Even in the Red Sea, where security risks have escalated, traffic patterns are defying expectations.
Routing Reality: Red Sea Still Crowded, Despite the Headlines
The industry has spent much of July recalibrating in the wake of deadly Houthi attacks on vessels transiting the Red Sea. Yet contrary to expectations, tanker traffic in the region hasn’t declined. In fact, it has increased. As TradeWinds reported this week:
“The number of tankers in the [Red Sea] region has actually gone up since the attacks… BRS says 48% are mainstream tankers.”
The figures challenge the narrative of a broad retreat. While some operators have opted to reroute around the Cape, a significant portion of tonnage—especially among Greek owners—continues to pass through the Bab el-Mandeb. The bifurcation is strategic: while some owners absorb the higher war-risk costs in exchange for shorter routes and quicker turnarounds, others are pricing in security risks and repositioning accordingly.
This divide is reshaping regional availability. Tonnage may appear present on paper, but real access is skewed by routing choices, flag acceptability, and insurer appetite.
Charterer lens:
- Don’t assume routing logic is uniform—Red Sea risk tolerance varies widely.
- Reconfirm ETA windows and route commitments even on familiar trades.
- Evaluate fixture options against insurer behavior, not just TCE levels.
Sanctions: Fragmented Enforcement Raises Legal and Logistical Risk
The EU’s 14th sanctions package blacklisted over 100 tankers, cut the crude price cap again, and imposed stricter documentation standards for ship-to-ship transfers. The UK followed by adjusting its own enforcement mechanisms. The U.S., notably, has yet to issue a formal response, but brokers believe Washington’s eventual stance will determine whether enforcement has teeth—or remains symbolic.
In the meantime, compliance has become its own operational burden. The due diligence required to ensure vessels are clean, covered, and clause-compliant is mounting—and so is the delay risk. Charterers using legacy templates are increasingly exposed to coverage gaps.
Charterer lens:
- Audit active vessel lists for exposure to EU/UK blacklists or Russian-linked trades.
- Review indemnity, vetting, and KYC workflows with counterparties—especially for STS cargoes.
- Engage legal teams early to align on cap compliance enforcement amid diverging regimes.
Rates & Assets: VLCC Optimism Diverges from Earning Reality
VLCC resale values remain firm, driven by tight newbuilding slots and owner belief in a long-cycle recovery. But earnings are not keeping pace. Spot rates remain under pressure in both AG–East and West Africa–China lanes, despite longer voyages and rerouting effects.
Part of the disconnect lies in the structure of demand: long-haul barrels are stable, but not growing. China and India have started diversifying away from sanctioned cargoes, buying more from West Africa, Latin America, and the U.S.—but with erratic timing. U.S. crude exports, once a driver of firming sentiment, are now being viewed as a “downside risk” by some analysts, as Gulf Coast liftings prove less sticky than expected.
Charterer lens:
- Be wary of forward rate optimism disconnected from actual cargo demand.
- Monitor asset value trends only as a signal—avoid assuming direct correlation with TCEs.
- Watch Asian import patterns for early signals of shifting route lengths and cargo timing.
Bunkers & Cost Pressures: Stable for Now, But Structurally Uncertain
VLSFO prices across key bunker hubs remained steady last week, even as Brent slipped slightly on mixed U.S. inventory data. But there’s fragility underneath. As more voyages round the Cape, fuel consumption is rising sharply—and charterers are increasingly pressed to justify cost pass-throughs amid stable benchmarks.
Simultaneously, the compliance burden for tracking bunker sources—especially for Russia-linked suppliers—has added another layer of diligence. For risk-averse charterers, this isn’t a procurement conversation anymore—it’s a legal one.
Charterer lens:
- Account for higher total fuel consumption when planning around Africa.
- Clarify bunker sourcing obligations in charter parties to avoid post-fixture disputes.
- Keep internal cost modeling agile—Cape voyages may need scenario planning beyond benchmark fuel indexes.
Final Word: In Tankers, It’s the Friction—Not the Flow
Volumes may not have dropped, but friction has risen dramatically. Charterers are no longer just moving barrels—they’re navigating sanctions ambiguity, elongated routes, bunker scrutiny, and counterparty risk. In this climate, traditional market reads—spot rates, demand forecasts, ship counts—don’t tell the whole story. Friction does. And those who manage it well will preserve margin in a market that no longer rewards assumptions.
Until next week,
— The Voyager Team
Before You Go…
CHECK OUT OUR NEW TOOL!
Explore our updated Port Turnaround Insights—a free tool to benchmark time in port by vessel type, cargo, and season. It’s just a snapshot of the data our clients use to improve planning and reduce demurrage exposure.
GET OUR LATEST PLAYBOOK
Download our latest eBook, The Steps Behind Managing a Demurrage Claim, and learn how to review claims more effectively, reduce error rates, and negotiate with confidence.
Follow The Voyager Dispatch on LinkedIn
Our weekly newsletter tracks global dynamics shaping chartering, demurrage, and freight. Want updates delivered straight to your feed? Follow us on LinkedIn to never miss a Dispatch.