A Market Balancing on Contradictions
Bulk shipping enters the third week of August under a swirl of opposing currents. Dry bulk rates have softened, yet structural debates over iron ore and steel hint at longer-term realignments. Tanker and LPG markets are grappling with port congestion, tariffs, and oil diplomacy, while bunker and crude forecasts temper expectations. U.S. gas output has climbed to unprecedented levels at the very moment Washington has turned its back on the IMO’s net-zero framework; a combination that complicates the outlook for global chartering strategies.
For charterers, the message this week is clear enough: market signals are murky, and freight exposure is being shaped as much by political maneuvering in Washington, Brasília, and Beijing as by supply-demand fundamentals.
Wet Cargo | Oil Diplomacy and Freight Friction
Tanker markets remain defined by geopolitics. India and Brazil, both squeezed by Trump’s tariff policy, are moving to deepen oil trade ties. For charterers, this signals potential for more South–South crude flows, though volumes will be gradual and infrastructure remains a bottleneck.
On the LPG side, the Persian Gulf–Japan VLGC benchmark has surged to a 16-month high. The drivers are twofold: congestion at Indian ports is stranding tonnage, while the Panama Canal continues to face draft restrictions, throttling east–west traffic. This squeeze has lifted rates and raised tonne-mile demand, though operational costs for rerouted or delayed cargoes are escalating.
Meanwhile, oil price projections add another dimension. The U.S. EIA has cut its forecast, now projecting WTI to average under $48/bbl in 2026; a downgrade that signals thinner margins for exporters and, by extension, less fuel for tanker demand. Not all agree: Standard Chartered projects closer to $75 by then. The divergence underscores just how uncertain forward planning has become.
Bunker prices have also whipsawed. The Ship & Bunker G20 VLSFO Index fell to an 11-week low before rebounding last week, reflecting both crude moves and uneven demand across ports. For charterers, it’s another reminder to scrutinize voyage costs beyond freight rates alone.
Charterer lens:
- Factor in higher LPG freight costs tied to India port congestion and Panama Canal restrictions.
- Prepare for crude trade diversions (e.g., India–Brazil) that may shift employment of Aframaxes and Suezmaxes.
- Budget conservatively on bunker costs: volatility remains high, complicating TCE calculations.
- Long-term oil price forecasts are diverging: chartering strategies should be built on flexible, short-to-medium horizon assumptions, not distant price bets.
Dry Bulk | Volumes Up, Orders Down
The Baltic Exchange reports a mixed market. Capesize earnings dipped last week, pressured by a slowdown in Pacific activity, while Panamax and Supramax segments showed steadier returns. Spot fixtures suggest sentiment is still being tested, with iron ore flows from Brazil and Australia showing resilience but without a strong uplift in ton-miles.
Structurally, iron ore is at a crossroads. A detailed analysis from Mining.com highlighted the market’s ongoing “grade shift”: China’s steelmakers are prioritising higher-grade imports to cut emissions and reduce furnace costs. This favors Australian and Brazilian supply, but narrows flexibility for mid-grade producers. Add to this an S&P Global interview with RHI Magnesita executives, who argue that ex-China steel output growth will be minimal by 2026, while nonferrous demand looks more promising. Together, these factors suggest a more subdued demand picture for traditional dry bulk commodities, especially if China’s construction slowdown persists.
Adding pressure, shipyards report one of the weakest years for new dry bulk orders in over a decade. Owners remain wary of regulatory uncertainty and rate volatility, preferring to defer fleet expansion.
Charterer lens:
- Monitor iron ore flows closely: higher-grade sourcing trends may narrow arbitrage routes.
- Steel demand beyond China looks subdued, leaving little in the way of fresh support for Capesize utilisation.
- The lack of newbuilding activity points to tighter fleet growth over the medium term, yet in the near term charterers still face the familiar challenge of oversupply.
- Consider flexibility in contracts where port or grade specifications may shift trade routes unexpectedly.
Regulatory | Gas Glut Meets Green Uncertainty
The U.S. is pumping record natural gas (averaging 106.7 Bcf/d in August) driven by a rebound in rigs and steady efficiency gains. Output from Appalachia and Haynesville is on the rise, with drilled-but-uncompleted wells being drawn down. LNG charterers can bank on abundant U.S. supply through 2026, but weak Asian pull and storage constraints may blunt immediate liftings.
Complicating matters further, Washington’s decision to reject the IMO’s net-zero framework clouds the regulatory horizon for decarbonisation in shipping. The Trump administration has branded the proposed levy a “global carbon tax on Americans,” warning of retaliation if implemented. While most IMO members back the scheme, the absence of U.S. alignment risks delaying or diluting enforcement. For charterers, the real issue is predictability: without clear rules, calculating exposure to carbon costs remains an exercise in scenario planning rather than compliance.
Charterer lens:
- U.S. gas output growth ensures LNG supply will not be the constraint; demand and storage will dictate flows.
- Expect chartering opportunities in LNG to remain volatile, with arbitrage windows opening sporadically.
- Carbon cost exposure is in limbo; charterers should run parallel scenarios for IMO adoption vs. delay.
- Contract clauses tied to emissions pricing may need updating ahead of October’s MEPC vote.
Final Word
For charterers, this week’s map is less about freight curves than about uncertainty across multiple fronts: oil diplomacy reshaping flows, iron ore demanding higher grades, gas production surging without a clear carbon framework to price it. Freight exposure is moving, but not along any neat or uniform storyline.
Rather than trying to chart a straight path, charterers must brace for a spectrum of outcomes — from VLGC congestion and plateauing steel demand to the uneven bite of a carbon levy. In 2025, adaptability is the closest thing the freight market has to certainty.
Until next week,
— The Voyager Team
Before You Go…
CHECK OUT OUR NEW TOOL!
Explore our updated Port Turnaround Insights—a free tool to benchmark time in port by vessel type, cargo, and season. It’s just a snapshot of the data our clients use to improve planning and reduce demurrage exposure.
GET OUR LATEST PLAYBOOK
Download our latest eBook, The Steps Behind Managing a Demurrage Claim, and learn how to review claims more effectively, reduce error rates, and negotiate with confidence.
Follow The Voyager Dispatch on LinkedIn
Our weekly newsletter tracks global dynamics shaping chartering, demurrage, and freight. Want updates delivered straight to your feed? Follow us on LinkedIn to never miss a Dispatch.